<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Malpractice World Wide Warning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www</link>
	<description>Malpractice in the news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:49:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Malpractice of a different kind?</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/73</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/73#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama Deception]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eAaQNACwaLw&#038;hl=nl&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eAaQNACwaLw&#038;hl=nl&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/73/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Texas&#8217; malpractice damage limits healthy?</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/66</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/66#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/66/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a lawsuit outlive the plaintiff?</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/65</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/65#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/65/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dancer gets $2.15 million in malpractice suit</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/64</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/64#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/64/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vegetative State, Death a Result of Medical Malpractice?</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/63</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/63#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/63/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we losing birth centers because of malpractice insurance cost?</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/62</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/62#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/62/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King med-mal documents sealed</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/61</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/61#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/61/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Camden-Clark faces $1.3M sanction in malpractice case</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/60</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/60#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/60/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man files $200,000 malpractice case against Thomas Memorial doctor</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/59</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/59#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 11:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/59/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NJ ob-gyns are asking prospective patients to sign away their right to a jury trial</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/58</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/58#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 12:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/58/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$5.7M Jury Award In Failure To Diagnose Skin Cancer</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/57</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/57#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 13:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/57/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PVH settles malpractice case out-of-court, receives victory in CON appeal</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/56</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/56#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 13:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/56/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Mason malpractice case challenges MPLA</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/55</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/55#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 13:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/55/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law prevents older children from suing over parents&#8217; deaths</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/54</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/54#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 13:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/54/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sangster awarded $3M in malpractice suit</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/53</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/53#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 12:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/53/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical malpractice trial under way</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/52</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/52#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 13:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/52/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naples gastroenterologist takes the stand</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/51</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/51#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/51/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malpractice not an &#8216;Epidemic&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/50</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/50#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 11:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/50/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chiropractor Malpractice Settlements To Be Public</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/49</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/49#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 16:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/49/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idaho Malpractice Trial</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/48</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/48#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/48/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SoCal woman sues after husband dies during hair transplant</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/47</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/47#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/47/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical case wins $2.27M</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/46</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/46#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/46/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suit against UCI Medical Center reinstated</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/45</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/45#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/45/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ideas for malpractice insurance</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/44</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/44#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/44/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juries found to sympathize more with doctors in malpractice cases</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/43</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/43#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 12:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/43/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malpractice suits pay out over $150m</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/42</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/42#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/42/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malpractice Mess</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/41</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/41#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/41/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woman sues hospital over flesh-eating bacteria</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/40</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/40#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/40/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate passes medical malpractice bill</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/39</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/39#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/39/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whopper! $7.2M in medical-malpractice case</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/38</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/38#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/38/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Sues U.S. for Malpractice, Wrongful Death</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/37</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/37#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/37/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Illinois medical malpractice cases settle before trial</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/35</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/35#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/35/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most medical malpractice claims in 7 States closed without compensation payments</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/34</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/34#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/34/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malpractice suit trial opens in Waco man&#8217;s death</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/36</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/36#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/36/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Widow warns others in blog</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/33</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/33#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/33/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical Malpractice, Kazakhstan Style!</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/32</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/32#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/32/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical malpractice, India Style!</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/31</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/31#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/31/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate pulls no punches</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/30</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/30#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/30/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crippling Malpractice Premiums</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/29</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/29#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/29/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fatal surgery results in $1 million malpractice verdict</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/28</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/28#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/28/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The unkindest cut</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/27</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/27#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/27/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fewer Women Are Getting Mammograms</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/26</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/26#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/26/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New book and tips on medical malpractice</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/25</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/25#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/25/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jury clears OB-GYN of claims of failing to diagnose breast cancer</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/24</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/24#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wendy Wiggings, having made numerous claims, has lost her malpractice suit against Dr. Tina Gingrich, who as one of the top doctors in the U.S. has received several awards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/24/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Number Of Obstetricians Declining</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/23</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/23#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/23/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WOLI Legal Nurse Consulting Certificate Program</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/18</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/18#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleFull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/18/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurance chief made $429,750 last year</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/16</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/16#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/16/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Settlement reached in Florida lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/15</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/15#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/15/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurer offers doctors a rare premium refund</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/14</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/14#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ArticleSmall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/14/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are pharmacies health care providers?</title>
		<link>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/17</link>
		<comments>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/17#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malpractice Watch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://malpractice.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/17/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
