Medical Malpractice in the news
READ MAIN PAGE  |  RSS Feed  |  RSS Comments  |  Log in  |  
search :

Aspartame  |   Big Brother  |   Debt  |   GMO  |   Goji  |   ID Theft  |   Jobs  |   Noni  |   RFID  |   Security  |   Pharma  |   Splenda  |   Thimerosal  |   Warming  |   Xango

Google
 

The unkindest cut
March 20, 2007

Source: Toronto Star
Patients about to undergo surgery with Toronto obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. Richard Austin have no way of knowing that more than a dozen women have claimed they suffered physical and emotional harm under his care. They wouldn’t be aware that some of Austin’s complication rates and unintentional cuts to internal organs are beyond what are acceptable, according to medical experts.

A search of the website of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario – the doctors’ self-regulatory body – shows an unblemished record. And The Scarborough Hospital where he has surgical privileges does not make data on doctors available to the public. No Ontario law compels physicians or hospitals to reveal details of a surgeon’s performance, such as the number of operations performed, complaints, malpractice suits, settlements or complication rates. But after searching public records at the Toronto courthouse, the Star discovered 14 women have filed suit against Austin since 1991.

Only one of the allegations has been proven in court, and there’s no way of evaluating whether the number of lawsuits is unusual for an obstetrician-gynecologist. The Canadian Medical Protective Association, a publicly funded defence fund that pays patient compensation on behalf of physicians, doesn’t disclose figures on lawsuits by medical specialty.

We don’t know whether the cases were more complicated than usual, or whether the conditions in the operating room were less than ideal. The overall number of suits against Austin is considered by experts to be above average. Paul Harte, one of Canada’s leading medical malpractice lawyers, called Austin’s 14 malpractice claims “significantly higher than average.” [more]

  1. Lydia Hartley wrote on February 4, 2010 at 11:46 am

    Richard Austin is a disgusting excuse of a doctor. He was my obstertician with my first child and despite my numerous attempts at having an ultrasound performed, he refused to issue a request stating that it wasn’t needed. My son now has only one functioning kidney and has many complications due to it, when a ultrasound would of revealed the problem and it could of been a simple correction while he was a newborn. Richard Austin was arogant and not fit to practice medicine let alone have total disregard for his patients well being. I am disgusted with him, my sons life will never be as it should and he will most likely be faced with dialisis and a kidney transplant down the road. Shame on our medical profession for allowing him to be anywhere near a hospital or patient!


Leave your own comment








You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



Medical Malpractice Warning Resources



    Aspartame  |   Big Brother  |   Debt  |   GMO  |   Goji  |   ID Theft  |   Jobs  |   Noni  |   RFID  |   Security  |   Pharma  |   Splenda  |   Thimerosal  |   Warming  |   Xango